[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725

Rittenhouse victim calls teen an ‘active shooter’ in homicide trial | The Independent

There are a lot of different takes on this.

Rittenhouse went there looking for trouble and armed to the teeth.

Actually, he went there to clean graffiti, put out fires and provide medical aid. It's all on video...

Nothing happened until Grossman decided to confront others protecting property, daring them to do something, saw Rittenhouse off on his own and started chasing him...

Rittenhouse had passed a multitude of people, offering medical aid, with no one getting upset...

[JMintzer]

Originally Posted by tvbound

I predict he will most likely be acquitted of the murder charges and can only hope the jurors recognize what really happened and he's convicted on lesser charges. A smarmy hero wannabe, with a gun, purposely put himself into a situation where he might get the chance to shoot someone. He carried a prop (the medic kit), yet never even bothered to try and use it on the people he killed/shot, because that wasn't the real reason he was there. As stated earlier, those who are most rooting him on are white supremacists/KKK/Proud Boys/Etc., who would love nothing more than to think that they are getting a green light, to go play vigilante tough guy at future protests and get away with the same thing as Rittenhouse. People and groups like that rooting you on, tells a reasonable/decent person all they need to know about the little thug, what happened - and his true motive for even being there.

Yeah, it's kinda' tough to give medical aid when a 2nd and third person are trying to kill you...

To the rest of your accusations... Sure, if you say so... But I'm pretty sure the people you mentioned wouldn't have me as one of their members...

But it must be amazing. You being able to know his "true motive"...

[Eg_cruz]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

He should've thought about that the moment before he brought his rifle into the car and made the trip to the riot.

And being only 17 and a typical stupid punk-arse kid, he woopsied on that decision. So having gotten to the riot and realized what a sh.*show it was, he should've hauled butt right back into the car. Another stupid decision on his part.

So - he'll have to live with knowing that he is "THAT GUY" for the rest of his life. If he doesn't like it, he could just plead guilty on all counts, GO to jail, where he can live the rest of his life in relative anonymity.

Smh

[Caymus]

Originally Posted by DeanFL

.
.
and.... here we go....>

Evers sending 500 National Guard troops to Kenosha ahead of Rittenhouse verdict
Posted: November 12, 2021 2:25 PM


.

.

....let the looting begin

[Alana33]

Unfortunately, I believe that he will get away with murder. Read the autopsy results of his victims.
Especially, the one shot in the back.
The judge is prejudiced in this case.
This is a excellent reason to ban the sale of assault weapons. He was locked and loaded, looking for trouble. He killed 2 humans. Injured a third.
Those he killed have family and loved ones.
He wasn't sorry at the bar with the white supremacist group. He should be found guilty.

[Weiserj]

You are spreading misinformation…go review your facts and amend, no delete, your comment 🤔

[Eg_cruz]

Originally Posted by Rainger99

Let's get people on the record before the verdict comes in.
This is your prediction of what the jury will do - not what you want the jury to do.

The choices are

Guilty on all counts
Guilty on some counts
Not guilty
Hung jury

I have come to realize that quite a lot of people who voice their opinions have not watched the trail just going off of the MSM headlines, which is sad. The MSM has an agenda and that’s to make you not know the truth.
So if you want to talked about it great but please watch the trail videos (all of them) and then voice your opinions.
Because you are talking about a young mans life and he should be able to have a fair trail and not be tried and hung by the MSM……PERIOD

Not Guilty……..

[Love2Swim]

Originally Posted by JMintzer

Incorrect.

1: His mother did not drive him there. He drove himself.

2: He did NOT transport an AR-15 across state lines. Oh, and the "State Lines" argument is BS anyway. Kenosha is right on the border between Wisconsin and Ohio. Many people live in one and work in the other. Rittenhouse was a lifeguard who worked in Kenosha. His father lived there. It was 15 minutes from his home.

Here in the DC area, millions of people "cross state lines" to work every single day. I live in MD, but work in DC...

3: Grosskreutz, (the parmedic) was carrying his pistol with an expired license, and actually traveled farther to get to Kenosha than did Rittenhouse...

4: There is no proof the Rittenhouse "beat up a girl"...

Did Kyle Rittenhouse Punch a Woman in This Video? | Snopes.com


But sure, let's start up with the arguments that got the other thread locked down...

You're right, the across state line thing doesn't mean anything. He wasn't licensed to carry an assault rifle in Wisconsin. And the crux of the matter is that he murdered two people, one unarmed, with the assault rifle he shouldn't have been in possession of.

As far as Snopes, someone needs to brush up on their reading skills. Snopes says there is plenty of proof. They show the two pictures, and it clearly looks like Rittenhouse. He is wearing a very unique pair of American flag clogs in both pictures. Snopes says it is most likely Rittenhouse but because it is based on visuals, it can't be confirmed 100%. So it appears he wasn't the little choir boy the defense would like everyone to believe. He very likely attacked this woman; he made remarks about how he wished he had his gun in case a couple of guys leaving a store had shoplifted - he said he'd kill them. He goes to a riot with an assault rifle...and afterwards poses for selfies with Proud Boys (a terrorist organization") with a tee shirt that says "Free as F**K as though he is a celebrity. The only remorse we've seen is the crocodile tears at the trial. Hmm...

[Eg_cruz]

Originally Posted by Alana33

Unfortunately, I believe that he will get away with murder. Read the autopsy results of his victims.
Especially, the one shot in the back.
The judge is prejudiced in this case.
This is a excellent reason to ban the sale of assault weapons. He was locked and loaded, looking for trouble. He killed 2 humans. Injured a third.
Those he killed have family and loved ones.
He wasn't sorry at the bar with the white supremacist group. He should be found guilty.

So obvious that you have not watched any of the trial because you would know no one was shot in the back.

[Daddymac]

Originally Posted by JSR22

I expect the punk to get off. I just wish he would be severely punished along with his mother.

You wish he would be severely punished?? FOR SELF DEFENSE !!!
Did you see what happened?? Skateboard to the head, hand gun pointed at your face. And the one guy that did live who he shot, testified that Rittenhouse was defending himself.

[Weiserj]

No she didn’t drive him….go back to square 1 and review the case.

[Eg_cruz]

Originally Posted by Madelaine Amee

I wonder what gives a young man of this age the right to think he can carry a gun and shoot people. What a really messed up world this has become. This will probably turn into another Federal case when the families of the deceased sue him privately afterward.

Here we go again, someone making a comment that is obvious you haven’t watched any of the hearing. Watch the hearing before you condemn someone.

[Eg_cruz]

Originally Posted by Love2Swim

Whether or not the victims were honorable or not is irrelevant. That would be like saying its okay to murder a prostitute because she is not honorable.

Murder is against the law, period. And if he is chasing someone down the street and guns them down, pretty hard to define that as "self defense".

With all your comments there are two thing happening here
1) you have not watch the 8 full days of trail
2) you get your info from headline news

[Eg_cruz]

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby

Just a little itty bitty tiny widdle difference:

HIS stupid decisions resulted directly in the creation of two corpses. "Boys will be boys" is not a reasonable excuse for that.

Was it Rittenhouse stupid decision or was it the stupid decision of the three thugs that ran after and attack a person with a gun. If I have a gun and you have your fist and a skateboard and you threaten my life and you run after me who’s the stupid one. When you are chasing me and I am running from you I turn around and point my gun and you still try to jump me….again who is the stupid one. I have a gun and I am on my back on the ground and you hit over the head with a skateboard as I have my gun who is the stupid one.
If I point a gun at your face and you shot me who is the stupid one. Oh and let’s not forget how on the stand he tell the truth and said he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse face and then 2 days later goes on Good Morning American where the host let’s him lie about what happen…….it was so shameful.

Had the thugs left him a lone they would be here today, committing more crimes and hurt more kids as they did in lives.

I wish you watch all 8 days with an open mind and not the mind of the haters of MSM

[Bogie Shooter]

Just sayin....
You live in The Villages and own a couple guns.
One afternoon you hear a lot of yelling and a shot is fired. Turns out it is at your next door neighbors house. You grab on of your guns and walk out your front door. A man exits next door out the front of your neighbors.
You raise your gun....and the man does as well. The man fires killing you and is later arrested and charged with murder.
His defense; he felt his life was threatened and shot in self defense.
Is he guilty or not of killing you?